Review



neuromorphometrics toolbox  (Neuromorphometrics Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Neuromorphometrics Inc neuromorphometrics toolbox
    Neuromorphometrics Toolbox, supplied by Neuromorphometrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/neuromorphometrics+toolbox/pmc09645766-465-17-17?v=Neuromorphometrics+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    neuromorphometrics toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    neuromorphometrics toolbox  (Neuromorphometrics Inc)
    90
    Neuromorphometrics Inc neuromorphometrics toolbox
    Neuromorphometrics Toolbox, supplied by Neuromorphometrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/neuromorphometrics+toolbox/pmc09645766-465-17-17?v=Neuromorphometrics+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    neuromorphometrics toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    neuromorphometrics spm toolbox  (Neuromorphometrics Inc)
    90
    Neuromorphometrics Inc neuromorphometrics spm toolbox
    Functional connectivity between each HMAT rsROI and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the seven participants with higher <t>misophonia</t> scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the 12 participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1, * p HB < 0.05.
    Neuromorphometrics Spm Toolbox, supplied by Neuromorphometrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/neuromorphometrics+toolbox/pmc09397125-204-50-56?v=Neuromorphometrics+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    neuromorphometrics spm toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    spm neuromorphometrics toolbox  (Neuromorphometrics Inc)
    90
    Neuromorphometrics Inc spm neuromorphometrics toolbox
    Functional connectivity between each HMAT rsROI and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the seven participants with higher <t>misophonia</t> scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the 12 participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1, * p HB < 0.05.
    Spm Neuromorphometrics Toolbox, supplied by Neuromorphometrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/neuromorphometrics+toolbox/bio_rxiv__2022__08__01__502365-200-10-11?v=Neuromorphometrics+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spm neuromorphometrics toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Functional connectivity between each HMAT rsROI and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the seven participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the 12 participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1, * p HB < 0.05.

    Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience

    Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia

    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional connectivity between each HMAT rsROI and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the seven participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the 12 participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1, * p HB < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the misophonia literature (e.g., , used the Neuromorphometrics SPM toolbox; used the Anatomical Automatic Labeling toolbox).

    Techniques: Functional Assay

    Functional connectivity between each HMAT rsROI and planum temporale (blue, top row) or posterior insula (green, bottom row), as a function of misophonia score.

    Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience

    Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia

    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional connectivity between each HMAT rsROI and planum temporale (blue, top row) or posterior insula (green, bottom row), as a function of misophonia score.

    Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the misophonia literature (e.g., , used the Neuromorphometrics SPM toolbox; used the Anatomical Automatic Labeling toolbox).

    Techniques: Functional Assay

    (A) Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer rsROI and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1, * p HB < 0.05. (B) Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer rsROI and planum temporale (blue, top row) or posterior insula (green, bottom row), as a function of misophonia score.

    Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience

    Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia

    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer rsROI and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1, * p HB < 0.05. (B) Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer rsROI and planum temporale (blue, top row) or posterior insula (green, bottom row), as a function of misophonia score.

    Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the misophonia literature (e.g., , used the Neuromorphometrics SPM toolbox; used the Anatomical Automatic Labeling toolbox).

    Techniques: Functional Assay

    Functional connectivity between each HMAT fROI (top row = Orofacial, bottom row = Finger) and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1.

    Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience

    Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia

    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional connectivity between each HMAT fROI (top row = Orofacial, bottom row = Finger) and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1.

    Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the misophonia literature (e.g., , used the Neuromorphometrics SPM toolbox; used the Anatomical Automatic Labeling toolbox).

    Techniques: Functional Assay

    Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer fROI (top row = Orofacial, bottom row = Finger) and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. * p HB < 0.05.

    Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience

    Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia

    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer fROI (top row = Orofacial, bottom row = Finger) and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. * p HB < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the misophonia literature (e.g., , used the Neuromorphometrics SPM toolbox; used the Anatomical Automatic Labeling toolbox).

    Techniques: Functional Assay